ENGLISH 京都大学
125周年
所長挨拶 概要 教員一覧 研究分野・施設 共同利用・共同研究 大型プロジェクト 教育,入試 広報,公開行事,年報 新着論文,出版 霊長類研究基金 リンク アクセス HANDBOOK FOR INTERNATIONAL RESEARCHERS Map of Inuyama
トピックス
お薦めの図書 質疑応答コーナー ボノボ チンパンジー「アイ」 行動解析用データセット 頭蓋骨画像データベース 霊長類学文献データベース サル類の飼育管理及び使用に関する指針 Study material catalogue/database 野生霊長類研究ガイドライン 霊長類ゲノムデータベース 写真アーカイヴ ビデオアーカイヴ

京都大学霊長類研究所
郵便番号484-8506
愛知県犬山市官林
TEL. 0568-63-0567(大代表)
FAX. 0568-63-0085

本ホーム・ページの内容の
無断転写を禁止します。
Copyright (c)
Primate Research Institute,
Kyoto University All rights reserved.


お問い合わせ

English

How did bonobos come to range south of the congo river? Reconsideration of the divergence of Pan paniscus from other Pan populations
Hiroyuki Takemoto, Yoshi Kawamoto and Takeshi Furuichi
概要

While investigating the genetic structure in wild bonobos,1 we realized that the widely accepted scenario positing that the Pleistocene appearance of the Congo River separated the common ancestor of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (P. paniscus) into two species is not supported by recent geographical knowledge about the formation of the Congo River. We explored the origin of bonobos using a broader biogeographical perspective by examining local faunas in the central African region. The submarine Congo River sediments and paleotopography of central Africa show that the Congo River has functioned as a geographical barrier for the last 34 million years. This evidence allows us to hypothesize that when the river was first formed, the ancestor of bonobos did not inhabit the current range of the species on the left bank of the Congo River but that, during rare times when the Congo River discharge decreased during the Pleistocene, one or more founder populations of ancestral Pan paniscus crossed the river to its left bank. The proposed scenario for formation of the Congo River and the corridor hypothesis for an ancestral bonobo population is key to understanding the distribution of great apes and their evolution.
書誌情報

Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews
Volume 24, Issue 5, pages 170-184, September/October 2015

DOI: 10.1002/evan.21456
2015/10/21 Primate Research Institute